Thomas Schacht, Ph.D. Concludes Father’s Parental Alienation

Thomas Schacht, Ph.D., forensic psychologist and professional witness testimony on parental alienation claims in a Tennessee custody case.

McClain v. McClain

[This case was originally briefed in this blog in 2018, but we wanted a deeper dive here about the forensic psychology testimony.]

The dad and mom on this Tennessee case had been divorced in 2001, and the court docket entered a parenting plan for his or her two kids.  There have been some modifications through the years, and as of 2009, the daddy was named main residential father or mother with 268 days of parenting time.  At a while thereafter, the mom relocated to Texas.  In 2015, the mom made a movement to switch custody, and she or he pointed to numerous alleged violations of the 2009 order.

The events had been ultimately in a position to come to phrases, and agreed to a brand new parenting plan.  The daddy was nonetheless main residential father or mother, and the mom was granted 85 days of parenting time, most of which might be exercised in Texas.  When the mom alleged extra violations by the daddy, the trial court docket ordered an evaluation by a forensic psychologist.

The mom had alleged that the daddy had begun denying in-person and phone contact with the youngsters, and had failed in his obligations to carry the youngsters to counseling classes.

Dr. Thomas Schacht, Forensic Psychologist. Click on to see his testimony from a televised legal trial, accessible on YouTube.

The forensic psychologist appointed by the trial court docket was Thomas Schacht, Ph.D., and he was directed to conduct “full psychological testing” of the dad and mom and the older little one.  Dr. Schacht’s report concluded that the youngsters had been “alienated from their mom, not justifiably estranged, and the alienation seems to be supported by the actions and statements of others, together with a minimum of their father and paternal grandmother.”

He had primarily based this conclusion upon evaluate of information and different supplies, reminiscent of textual content messages, in addition to interviews with the dad and mom, kids, academics, and principal.  One of many textual content messages was from the older little one to the mom through which he referred to the mom as “devil” and expressed his opinion that he would sometime see “each of you burning under.”  He later testified that by “each of you,” he meant his mom and maternal grandmother.  He concluded the textual content by stating that he hoped his mom loved her final trip along with her favourite little one, specifically, the youthful one.

Dr. Schacht had additionally famous suicidal ideation by each kids, however concluded that these had been pushed largely to manage outcomes, versus true expressions of a want to harm themselves.

The mom had been recognized with bipolar dysfunction, and the daddy had expressed to the older little one his view that psychological sickness was a “non secular downside.”  Dr. Schacht acknowledged his opinion that this affect was a possible danger to the youngsters in the event that they had been affected by a psychological sickness sooner or later.

Primarily based upon Dr. Schacht’s testimony, the trial court docket concluded that there had been a “extreme” case of parental alienation.  Dr. Schacht had had proposed 4 choices for coping with this alienation.  The primary was to easily grant the daddy unique custody with no visitation by the mom, which amounted to preserving the established order.  The second choice was to maintain the daddy as main residential father or mother, however with efforts to treatment the alienation.  The third choice was to position the youngsters in a impartial setting away from each dad and mom.  The ultimate choice was to call the mom as main residential father or mother and droop all contact with the daddy till the youngsters demonstrated progress of their relationship with their mom.

For that fourth choice, Dr. Schacht had really useful a workshop named Household Bridges in California.  The trial court docket felt that this may be the best choice.  For the reason that father had the better earnings, he was to be answerable for two-thirds of the price of Household Bridges.

The mom was named the first residential father or mother with sole decision-making authority.  The daddy was to don’t have any contact with the youngsters for a minimum of 90 days, beginning with the graduation of the Household Bridges Workshop.  His future parenting time was to be contingent upon compliance with workshop tips.

The older little one turned 18 in 2016, and the orders regarding him had been to don’t have any impact after that point.

The daddy finally appealed to the Tennessee Courtroom of Appeals.  On the difficulty of change of custody, the appeals court docket famous that parental alienation is a growth that constitutes a “materials change of circumstances,” warranting a change.

The appeals court docket agreed with the decrease court docket that the proof, significantly Dr. Schacht’s report, supported the decrease court docket’s discovering that there had been a extreme case of parental alienation towards the mom by the daddy and paternal grandmother.  The decrease court docket had discovered, and the appeals court docket agreed, that each events had alternative to current info to Dr. Schacht, and that he was not lacking any important info.

The appeals court docket identified that the decrease court docket had discovered Dr. Schacht’s testimony to be very credible, however that the daddy’s testimony typically consisted of maximum adverse generalizations in regards to the mom.

Dr. Schacht concluded that the alienation of the youngsters from the mom had reached “disaster proportions,” and the appeals court docket agreed with this characterization.

For these causes, the appeals court docket agreed that there had been a fabric change of circumstances, and it went on to conclude that the change of custody, coupled with the Household Bridges Workshop, was within the kids’s finest curiosity.

539 S.W.3d 170 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017).

See unique opinion for precise language.  Authorized citations omitted.

To be taught extra, see Baby Custody Legal guidelines in Tennessee and our video, How is little one custody decided in Tennessee?

See additionally Tennessee Parenting Plans and Child Support Worksheets: Building a Constructive Future for Your Family that includes examples of parenting plans and little one help worksheets from actual circumstances accessible on